Out of Order?: Russian Prefixes, Complexity-based Ordering and Acyclicity
نویسنده
چکیده
There is a longstanding debate about how to appropriately model the combinability of affixes, especially English suffixes. One widely accepted principle is the notion of so-called selectional restrictions, i.e. grammatical requirements of particular affixes. For example, the suffix -ness can only combine with adjectival bases. Hay (2002) proposed a psycholinguistic approach to affix ordering now known as Complexity-Based Ordering (CBO), which claims that affix order is determined by the parsability of the affixes, i.e. more separable affixes can appear only outside of less separable affixes. Hay shows that this principle accounts for why many grammatical affix combinations are unattested. CBO has since been supported by research of derivational affixes (English prefixes, English suffixes and Russian suffixes). However, as a processing model, CBO should apply very broadly, and in this paper, I discuss some difficulties of reconciling CBO with inflectional affixes. I also examine combinations of Russian prefixes which have some properties typical of inflection and show, surprisingly, that they can be ordered with a significantly low number of cycles, as CBO predicts. I discuss alternatives to CBO that explain this phenomenon, and suggest future research to distinguish them. This working paper is available in University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics: http://repository.upenn.edu/pwpl/ vol19/iss1/19 U. Penn Working Papers in Linguistics, Volume 19.1, 2013 Out of Order?: Russian Prefixes, Complexity-based Ordering and Acyclicity
منابع مشابه
Effect of Perfective Prefixes on Object Interpretation: A Theoretical and Empirical Issue
This experimental study brings evidence from second language acquisition (L2A) to bear on a theoretical issue that has been called into question by native speaker judgments: the semantic effect Russian perfective prefixes have on object interpretation. In perfective sentences, article-less bare plural and mass objects are interpreted as denoting a specific quantity. Russian native speakers do n...
متن کاملTime and the Event: the Semantics of Russian Prefixes
The vast majority of prefixed roots fall into the perfective class, although there are some perfectives that are not prefixed. Imperfective verb forms are either unprefixed altogether, or possess a suffixal marker of imperfectivity (generally called the ‘secondary’ imperfective). The analytical problem is this: despite this apparently uniform effect on the interpretation of the tense morphology...
متن کاملRussian Yers and Prosodic Structure
In this paper I investigate a previously neglected aspect of the phonology of Russian vowel-∅ alternations involving verbal prefixes and prepositions. There is evidence both for and against the notion that prepositions and verbal prefixes — which I will call P, for short — have identical phonological behavior. There are at least two processes that suggest that P forms a unified phonological cat...
متن کاملRussian prefixes and prepositions in Stratal OT
A less discussed point — though equally evident — is that Russian prefixes and prepositions cannot be unified as a class on the basis of their morphosyntactic characteristics. The theoretical aim of the present work is to resolve the apparent contradiction between the phonological unity and the morphosyntactic disunity of these two categories, by proposing a Stratal Optimality Theoretic approac...
متن کاملPhonetic evidence for clitic-host relations within the prepositional group in Russian
The paper presents a corpus-based research on clitic-host relations within the prepositional group in Russian. As a phonetic criterion for determining the relation between clitics and their hosts, we suggest using the degree of vowel reduction— the phenomenon functioning within the prosodic word. A comparison of vowel reduction patterns for clitic group vs prosodic word with no adjacent clitics...
متن کامل